About Me

Name: KsReaganite
Email: ksreaganite@cox.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

A link worth it

Today I am adding to my blog roll on the right side panel of this screen a link that is both substantive and symbolic. It will take you to the wonderful website of AIPAC, the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, an organization dedicated to keeping strong the support of the people of the United States for Israel. Israel is the closest ally America has in the world along with Turkey and the Unitedt Kingdom. There have been times (like the Scud attacks in the First Gulf War) that Israel has sacrificed its own safety for the sake of American security. These are our friends, and AIPAC is their lobby in America.

KsReaganite has been a long time proud supporter of a democratic Israel within safe and secure borders and with a united Jerusalem as it ancient and eternal capital. For as the Psalmist said thousands of years ago, If I forget thee O Jersalem, let my right hand forget its cunning and my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth.

Tags: AIPAC  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: The candidate endorsed by child rapists

A carefully crafted death penalty law that punishes those adults who rape (and we are not talking about statutory rape) small children envisions a punishment 'that is disproportional to the nature of the crime', so sayeth the United States Supreme Court. The 5-4 decision was joined by all the four liberal judges (the kind that Barack Obama has pledged to appoint) along with one 'moderate' and vigorously opposed by the four so-called conservative judges (the kind that John McCain has promised to seek). Well, normal, average, decent America, itf you ever needed a reason for being ultra leery of Barack Obama's judicial picks-and wanting know why it is important to have judges who RESPECT the right of legislature to protect the vulnerable-you need to reflect on this.
 
The liberal Democrats fervently believe that our liberites are served by having judges who think the death penalty in too much punishment for the rapist of a seven year old girl. And that is exactly the kind of judges you will get at every level of the federal judiciary when Barack Obama becomes president. Oh I know Obama said he 'disagreed' with the decision; what else did you expect him to say? But time and again he has said and will say that he will appoint judges like Justices John Paul Steven and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, judges who passionately believe in going light on child rapists.
 
Now, KsReaganite is almost an opponent of the death penalty and finds it very very disturbing. But for rape of a child, once it has been proven by eye witness testimony and credible due process to a jury of peers, my conscience will have no qualms in saying: fry the son of a witch if that is what the law says.
 
You want your child protected? Better vote McCain because if Mr. Obama becomes president, the rape of a seven year old girl may not be something we'd be allowed to punish too harshly.
 
By the way, you'll notice not a squeak about the decision today from Planned Parenthood and NOW; if it surpsises you, it doesn't surpsise me, because for all their glossy public relations, I have always considered those groups to be extremely anti-children. Plus they are embarassed after screaming at the top of their lungs how liberal judges were needed to protect women and children; please, the liberal judges just endorsed the rape of a seven year old girl. Shame on these pro-pedophile liberal judges and the groups who support them.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Yearning unto death

As I watch with horro the open and deliberate attack on innocent men and women in Zimbabwe whose only crime has been to yearn for freedom from a megalomanic tyrant, it is not lost on me how largely silent the mainstream civil scoiety has been. None of that outrage for sanctions and divestment that we saw in the 1980s when the culprit was the white minority government in South Africa or the 1970s when the culprit was the much gentler-by Mugabe's standards-white minority government of Zimbabwe (then called Rhodesia) itself. Why is it that when blacks brutalize blacks, our consciences fall silent? Is it because in the halls of the effiminate, French wine sipping, self declared enlightened Boston Brahmins, it is considered impolite to criticize certain groups, no matter who the victim is?
 
Thousands have been murdered, hundreds raped, entire villages burnt to the ground, and scores of children abducted...all because they dared to hope for freedom in the foulest land in southern Africa. And yet, largely thanks to the deafening silence of the liberal elite in Washington, more will in the hope, perhaps forlorn, that freedom will come to them in their lifetimes.
 
While the couplet was written perhaps for a beloved individual or Spirit, the words of the Persian-Urdu poet Mirza Ghalib capture the unto-death yearning for freedom in Zimbabwe very well.
 
It was not in my fate to meet my beloved;
Had I lived but longer, this would still be my only desire.
But to live on your promise is to make my life a lie,
Would I not have died of happiness had I trusted it?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pawlenty, take II

As promised in my previous post, here is further on Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty's bonafides.
 
Timothy Pawlenty is the archtype of the Reagan Democrat with which the GOP is trying to reconnect. Granted that Pawlenty is a Republican, however, his background screams 'Reagan Democrat': blue collar roots, ethnic Roman Catholic parents (though the governor, being a guy of course, followed his good wife into the Southern Baptist oriented evangelical churches), family involvement in labor unions, ardent hunter and angler. As a governor he continues to play ice hockey with his brothers on a charity team, often stops by small burger joints and pubs, and hosts a radio show. He is one of the 'guys'. That may be the reason, perhaps, that in the Republican debacle of 2006, Pawlenty was getting reelected in a very Democratic state over a very popular liberal Democrat challenger. If symbolism matters in elections, and we know it does, Tim Pawlenty is our guy. Plus, some polls suggest strongly that he may help carry Minnesota for us (No Democrat has ever won the White House without carrying Minnesota in the last sixty years).
 
This guy will firmly underline the fact that today, it is the Republican Party that is the party of the average American who works hard, loves his country, goes to church, and has a beer or two while watching NASCAR races. Tim Pawlenty's nomination will underscore what everyone but the mass media knows now: the Democratic Party is the party of over educated, snobbish, wine sipping, French film watching, Catholic hating, secular elitists who consider gun owning and church attendance as examples of the bitterness of racists.
 
And lest it come up, Governor Tim and Judge Mary Pawlenty have been married for a long time, their first and only marriage, and are blessed with two children. Mary Pawlenty, who recently resigned as district court judge to become head of a mediation service, is of course the type of woman who frightens liberal Democrats to the core. A reputed trial lawyer, who was appointed judge in her own right by former Governor Arne Carlson, Mrs. Pawlenty has never shied away from being a woman of faith and has always maintained that her family comes first and foremost in her life. Suffice to say, that in her reelection campaigns for judgeship, she received not a dime from the Womens National Lawyers Association (WNLA), Planned Parenthood, or Emily's List. This is a woman who is her own person, not beholden to anyone for success but to her Creator. She'd be an awesome Second Lady of the United States of America.
 
Let's roll!!!!
 
John McCain-Tim Pawlenty 2008
The winning ticket for real America
Tags: Pawlenty II  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

KsReaganite's Veepstakes

Everyone else has had a speculative say, and now it's my turn. After careful consideration of the probables, KsReaganite is happy to recommend Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty as the vice presidential nominee of the GOP. More on the endorsement later as I am on the road this week, but suffice to say that Governor Pawlenty's principles are solid, his heart compassionate, and his executive experience commendable. And yes, he has a first class wife in Judge Mary Pawlenty!
Tags: Pawlenty  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What a Father's Day

While we listen to the sappy nonsense of liberal politicians on Father's Day, let's not forget that todat there are 12 million, yes that is ten plus one two, good fathers in this land of the free who are denied the right to be participants in the lives of their own children. These men are not convicts, they are not the defaulters of the crushing tax known as 'child support' (which should be actually called  'new boyfriend support'), and they are not those who abandoned their children (as Barack Obama seems to think all absent fathers do). No, these are men whose only fault was to be married to women who one day decided that they needed new fathers for their children, used unilateral no-fault divorce, and got the radicalized family courts to kick out the men from their own homes and the lives of their own children.

And no court will do a darn thing to stop this miscarriage of justice, a miscariage whose astronomical costs include juvenile delinquency, child molestation, teen pregnancy, and educational disasters. Yes, the numbers tell the story: boys without biological fathers at home are secen times more likely to have a brush in with the law, girls six times the national rate of teen pregnancy, and both ten times more likely to underachieve in school. The number one source of child molestation in America? You got it! The unrelated boyfriend or next husband of the woman who lives with her children sired by another man.
 
You wonder why do the politicans, bureaucrats, and courts do nothing? Are you kidding? Why should they? Child welfare bureaucrats ake money everytime there is a child support order..and hence everytime there is a no-fault divorce. They make even more money if one parent (always the mother) gets full custody. Politicians are too scared to challenge the liberal media or compromise the donations of extremist groups like NOW and Planned Parenthood, whose business is dependent on marginalization of nuclear families. And judges are drawn from the legal fraternity whose very bread and butter is fed by unilateral no faul divorce and full child custody by divorcing women.
 
With the signal exception of some 12 states, the rest of the country wallows in this state sponsored destruction of families by the same people who, today, will make speeches on the importance of fatherhood. These politicians, and most of them are anatomically men I will grant, do deserve to have their own children and their children's children taken away from them in the same fashion by a family court. Only then will they understand.
 
The biggest threat to this disgraceful racket of anti-child, anti-father regime are bills that promote a rebuttable presumption shared parenting when parents split.  Carefully notice what happens every time such a bill comes up in your legislature. I will bet you a million that you see child welfare bureaucrats, radical feminists, the divorce bar, cowardly Democrats, liberal Republicans, and newspaper editors all opposing it. Of course they will; they know where their bread is buttered.
 
Every American man, on the verge of blissful matrimony, should keep this in mind. Unless he lives in those 12 states, his wife can simply decide she wants to end the marriage for no reason, kick him out of the house, and, most painful of all, take his children away so that he gets to see them a dozen times a year. All this can happen overnight; it does; and there is nothing in the law in most states to prevent it. Rather, most state judicial system thrive on this sort legal regime. Welcome to Islamic Sharia Law, American style.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Last Men in Europe

There is some self-respecting manliness left in Western Europe after all. Ignoring the tremendous pressure, threats, and outright economic bribery by their politicians, big businesses, big union, and Brussells, the voters of Ireland rejected on Thursday the Lisbon Treaty. The said treaty, a new super Constitution for a European mega state run by unelected bureaucrats, has been meekly ratified by eighteen big and small countries who have neither a sense of culture nor any idea of consequences. Bowing sheepishly to the lure of a pan European supra state where everything is 'taken care of' by 'enlightened' bureaucrats and 'silly' national laws are vetoed by the pen of mid-level civil servants, many of the erstwhile great European people simply went along.
 
But not the Irish.
 
Leave it to them to be proud of their culture, their traditions, and their hard fought freedom. Even as Ireland has become one of the richest countries in Europe-surpassing the United Kingdom and France in per capita income-her people's sharp sense of national identity and Christian faith has remained intact to a large extent. It is an identity and faith that has prompted Ireland to have, in all of Europe, the strongest legal protections for free speech, traditional marriage, unborn children, migrants, and the poor. It is heartening to see that even the threats and bribery of Europe's mightiest politicians, businessmen, and civil servants could not buy the Irish off.
 
Real men, as the Irish poet W B Yates noted, cannot be easily persuaded to part with their birthright. Freedom is the birthright of the Irish; even in 2008 they have men amongst them who won't give it up for a few silver farthings.
 
Go mbeannaí Dia is Muire duit!
 
Tags: Irish EU  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oh Canada!

A couple of weeks ago we were passionately debating the issue of California’s unelected judges legalizing gay ‘marriage’.. The debate was heated, lots of feelings were bruised, and I doubt too many people changed their views. Most argued from the core of their convictions for it touched on principles held deep within the soul.

We should be all thankful that most of us who participated in that debate live in the United States. Think about these two stories that have been, not surprisingly, not too widely reported by the mainstream media and the established denizens of ‘human rights’. In one case, a very prominent pastor was dragged before a ‘human rights tribunal’ for a letter he wrote to a newspaper editor in which he strongly opposed gay marriage. The sentence of the tribunal? Publicly apologize to the gay community, lose forever your rights to speak on the issue gay marriage in print, internet, radio or television, go through a ‘reeducation’ program, and pay a fine of 7000. Failure to comply will result in imprisonment. The other story involved another human rights tribunal in the same country that imposed a very similar sentence, with a slightly lesser fine, on a prominent journalist whose article used strong language against Middle Eastern terror groups whom the said journalist very clearly separated in his article from regular law abiding Muslims and Arabs.

The incidents mentioned above did not happen in some Taliban court in Afghanistan or a Nazi ‘peoples court’ in Germany. They are the very recent verdicts of the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal and the British Columbia Human Rights tribunal in that erstwhile beacon of freedom, Canada.

Any Canadian internet posters specially should take notice. If your viewpoints expressed here are in conflict with the bureaucrats who staff the ‘human rights tribunal’ in your province, you may be prosecuted and sent to reeducation camps. It is no longer a Orwellian nightmare..it’s a reality.

And by the…what happened in Canada is exactly what the liberal Democrats want in the United States. The so called ‘hate’ crimes law that the Democrat Congress has passed (but President Bush promise a veto) will be signed by Barack Obama in an instant and he has said so.

When Barack Obama and the liberal Democrats go after your pastor and bishop for the ‘wrong’ kind of sermons, don’t pretend that we didn’t warn you. When they pick up journalists in the middle of the night for writing against multiculturalism, don’t tell KsReaganite he didn’t tell you everything. For you and you alone will be responsible when, angered over the price of gas and the news from Iraq, you turn the ancient liberties of religious worship, free speech, and free press over to the fascists who come like Greeks bearing gifts of hope and change. And you would have deserved it richly.

You think it can’t happen here, don’t you? Well, that’s what the Germans thought..after all, they had democracy, a Constitution, a parliament, and a strong willed people. That’s what the Canadians thought.

In democratic societies, liberty is never lost in one stroke; but it is rather eroded slowly and incrementally while the people are lulled by a false sense of security, pride, enlightenment, and civility. When they finally wake up, it is too late.

Tags: Canada  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

College: The Dem fallacy

One of the most loathsome and corrupting intellectual elements of latter day liberalism is the idea that everyone should go to college and taxpayers should pay for part of it. The entire thrust of the liberal Democrat legislative education agenda in Congress is to increase the share of the taxpayer’s burden to send everyone to college.

Everyone should not go to college because college isn’t for everyone, no matter how offended the liberal Dems feel about that truth. Nor does society benefit from such a silly and expensive idea. Truth be told, for large proportion of ‘students’ in college, it is five and six years of attending the easiest classes possible to get away with the most worthless degree imaginable, in between bouts of drinking, partying, and doing drugs. These ‘students’ want the parents and the government to pick up the tab for the entire experience while their own part time jobs are used to defray the payments on their sporty cars, fraternity fees, and beer runs. And if and when they do graduate, the search is on to linger on with a few classes here and a course there to defer payment on the already heavily subsidized school loans for the longest term possible. Rarely do you see these ‘students’ actually majoring in the hard sciences, criminal justice, economics, engineering, or business though many start of that way. No, often such individuals are found in art history, sociology, general studies, anthropology, women studies, philosophy and the like. We already pay for them to have the ‘college’ experience; now the Dems want us to pay even more.

Frankly, the truth be told, the federal government should not be subsidizing college education at all with the exception of education in areas that are deemed vital to national security, public safety, and macro-economic well being of society. That doesn’t mean that art history or women studies are not worthy majors; it only implies that those are not majors that the taxpayer need to fund from their pockets. I will be blunt: an art museum director is important to civic society, but not a tenth as much so as a police officer or computer engineer.

Readers will probably wonder if I am one of those anti-intellectual kinds who are against formal learning. Or may be I was born with a golden spoon in my mouth. Far from it, KsReaganite has been both a student and a teacher in higher academia and remains an alumnus of one the biggest college fraternities in the country. But my college education was not financed one dime by any government but by hard sacrifices. Sacrifice on the part of average hard working parents who eschewed ever newer cars and vacations so that their children went to college. Sacrifice on the part of the student who shared very modest dwellings and made Ramen noodles a part of regular diet. Not that any of this should matter for the veracity of commentary must stand on its own logic, principle, and rationale, not on the background of the commentator. But I know how many readers can, understandably, react.
 
Let's be honest. The real reason so many liberal Dems want everyone to go to college is to divert taxes to the ultra liberal faculties who want to get paid to spew their Stalinist ideology on campuses. They want Americans to pay for the brainwashing of their own children. Typical totalitarian approach.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Important Days

Yesterday marked the fourth anniversary of the passing of the namesake of this blog, our beloved 40th president, Ronald Wilson Reagan. Let us remember Ron and Nancy in our prayers and give thanks for his leadership at a time when America was it's lowest and our enemies at their zenith. Thanks to President Reagan's faith in the Shining City on the Hill, the organized global slavery known as Communism is now largely history. Don't worry...one term of John McCain and the last vestiges of Communism will be gone from Cuba and North Korea too.
 
Today, June 6, is of course, the anniversary of D-Day. On that day sixty four years ago, soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen of the British Commonwealth, the United States, Free France, and Poland went ashore to begin the end of Third Reich. It was the biggest amphibious operation in the history of man. But more important, it was the triumph of the idea that some values are worth fighting for and sacrificing for selflessly. Those who want to cut and run in Iraq just don't get it.
 
God Bless the Coalition of the Willing.
Tags: D Day  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pursuing the WF demographic

It will come down to one key demographic: the working class white woman. She is the one who couldn't afford college or didn't want to burden herself with a pricey college education, the one who often drinks a beer or two over the weekend wondering how to fill up her gas tank for the commute next week, the one who considers God and country a part of everyday life. She was the one who stood firm for Hillary Rodham Clinton as the midriff baring teeny boppers wannabes sipped Chablis and toasted their new messiah Obama.
 
She is the one John Sidney McCain must woo and Barack Hussein Obama must seduce.
 
Not a minute must be wasted in reaching out to the millions of such women who are as patriotic as you and I, who work hard every day, and who feel disgusted that their own husbands, sons, and brothers are mocked as relics of a Neanderthal past by the hipster Obama machine. I sincerely doubt that they much care for having a president endorsed by those who have pledged to wipe us off the map. Sure we have differences with the Clinton brigades over taxes and trade; but what unites us in wanting to make sure that America is safe is greater than the monetary issues that divide us.
 
It is in the hearts and souls of these women that the safety of America and the future of the free world rests.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Scared of a tough woman

Over the weekend, while waiting for someone very dear to me, I had the dubious pleasure of watching HBO’s ‘Recount’, a dramatization about the Florida recounts in the 2000 presidential election. Given that radical activist Kevin Spacey was in the lead role, I did not expect the cable movie to be unbiased, and it was not. Unsurprisingly the film made the Al Gore guys look good and the George Bush fellas look bad. Nonetheless, it was good acting and a well researched script..to give credit where credit is due. What did indeed surprise and shock me, however, was the vehement vendetta with which the producers went after the then Florida Secretary of State (and later Member of Congress) Katherine Harris. I mean she was not the lead figure in the real story (Gore, Bush, Judge Lewis, and the Supreme Court were) but she certainly must have crossed Hollywood the wrong way.

‘Recount’ portrays Ms. Harris as a vainglorious, self-centered, clueless politicians who is corrupt to the bone and who often talks about Biblical verses. I had met Ms. Harris once briefly and found her to be anything but. Except..yes, she is a woman of deep faith. And that should have made me immune to the initial surprise at seeing HBO’s nasty caricature of her.

You see, Katherine Harris is everything that the liberals hate about a woman. She is made her way in the tough world of Florida politics without the benefit of a politician husband and without becoming the concubine of extremist groups like NOW and NEA. She got an Ivy League education and yet remained faithful to the values that she learnt in Florida Panhandle’s small towns. She dresses well, speaks in complete sentences, and has no problem putting down prima donna men with big egos and small minds. And, to top it all, she confesses openly and boldly to being a Bible believing Christian woman who believes in the Ten Commandments personally and publicly (none of that silly ‘I am personally…but…’ nonsense from this woman).

Women like Katherine Harris scare the liberals and disgust them. The likes of her turn on its head the false idea that a 21st century modern American woman can express her political philosophy only after clearance from the self proclaimed feminist radicals at NOW and WNLA.

No wonder, Hollywood hates Katherine Harris
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Child Welfare Upside Down

It is heartening to note that the Supreme Court of Texas affirmed today the fundamental right of parents to raise their children. Barring serious evidence of abuse and neglect, no state authority or petty bureaucrat should try to impose their self-declared enlightened views of 'good parenting' on the people they are supposed to serve. The Texas child protective services overreacted, egged on by greedy lawyers and a tabloid mentality mass media that just doesn't consider FLDS people to be normal. For once, the gestapo tactics of the child welfare bureaucracy has been checked in one state. But make no mistake about it. That bureaucracy makes its livelihood, earns its prestige and promotions, and bases its very existence on the largely unchecked power to destroy families. The more children who are removed from their parents, especially from fathers but also increasingly from mothers, the more federal and state tax dollars can be poured into the bonuses of these bureaucrats. In reality, at the ground level, not even the FBI has the arbitrary power over the lives of ordinary Americans that their local child 'welfare' bureaucrats do.
 
What happened in Texas should not have happened to begin with. It should never have happened in America. Dragging two year olds away from their mothers and fathers and shipping them off to orphanages is reminiscent of the Nazis and the Bolsheviks. I wish I could say that judges in most states are courageous enough to stand up to the 'family' bar and the child welfare bureaucracy. The same child welfare bureaucracy that dare not intervene on behalf of the hundreds of children abused and dozens murdered by the unrelated boyfriends of the mothers is quick to kidnap children to 'protect' the kids from two loving parents. This is child welfare turned upside down. And you can thank the 'family' section of the American Bar Association and NWLA for that.
Tags: FLDS  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Finally, Part III of Intellectual Test for non-conservatives

Okay..as promised here is part three. Before you go any further, please consult your honest answers-given BEFORE you saw this part III-to the first two parts of this exercise. Then compare and think deeply.
 
1. Is the killing of unborn children morally offensive to you?
 
2. Do you personally believe that unborn children should not be killed?
 
3. Some religions and cultures do not consider the killing of unborn children to be murder; do you believe we should have laws protecting unborn children from being killed?
 
4. If we have laws that impose upon everyone, regardless of religious belief, the duty not to be cruel to animals, should we have laws that impose on everyone the duty to protect unborn children from cruelty?
 
5. Should we declare Civil Rights laws unconstitutional because racists do not believe that racism is morally offensive even though YOU personally believe that racism is morally offensive?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

To Those Fallen

While Veterans Day, November 11, is reserved fto pay respects for all those who have served the country in war, Memorial Day pays homage to a more select elite: those who made the ultimate sacrifice in the defense of their flag. Its origins lie in the War of the Rebellion (the so-called Civil War) which is, to this day, the costliest American war in terms of human lives. The first Memorial Day, in 1865, was designed to mark a solemn day of reflection and prayer (thankfully no ACLU was there to sue anyone praying then) in honor of those tens of thousands of American officers and enlisted men who paid the ultimate price in order to uphold the flag of their fathers when that flag, and the Republic for which it stood, was threatened by a well organized insurrection and widespread rebellion of the the slaveocracy.

Since then, every generation of Americans has been called upon to pay its share of the price of freedom. Some have paid dearly and not flinched. One is reminded of the story of the first Republican President who, in the midst of the bloodiest war in American history, wrote a letter of heartfelt sympathy to a mother who'd lost four sons at the altar of freedom. The woman's reply was classic: she only regretted that she had no more sons to give to the cause of the Union that her forefathers had made wit their own hands. It is a concept too bizarre ad too weird for the latte liberals of the New York Times and the Obamamaniacs to fathom.
 
God Bless Those Who Have Fallen in Defense of Freedom
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive