About Me

Name: KsReaganite
Email: ksreaganite@cox.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The Second Half of the FDR revolution

What we saw Thursday night were two men dispaying their class...class as in character, upbringing, values. On one hand, unprecedented in our history, a John McCain took out televised national ads to congratulate his opponent on winning the nomination and wishing him good luck. On the other hand, Barack Obama stood in his Greek temple like a demi-god and attacked the decency of John McCain....and then had the chutzpah to pledge a restoration of civility in our body politic.
 
And by the way, Cicncinnatus Imperator Barrckus promised to have the federal government take over healthcare, energy, and education so that we can all be happy. Ah...like Vladimir Ilyavich Lenin did..and Castro did...and Mao Zedong did. This is the coming of the second half of the FDR New Deal revolution...the socialization of what is left of our private sector. No wonder, the Barrackster mentioned FDR as one his heroes.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A decent speech

Moments ago Hillary Rodham Clinton finished speaking at the Democratic National Convention. With the exception of the required few nasty digs at 'her friend' John McCain, the speech was remarkably decent and fair for a political convention. I was pleasantly surprised at its display of civility, coming from a personality generally associated with polarizing politics. This is specially so given my last post. I did notice, however, that in her tribute to the 19th Amendment (the right to vote for women), Mrs. Clinton plainly overlooked the historical legacy of the suffrage movement: it was a struggle that was backed by the Republican Party and generally opposed by the Democrats (just like the fight for the rights of slaves and of the unborn). But bless her heart, she managed to deliver a good upbeat political speech with no more than three personal attacks at John McCain. That is a huge accomplishment for any Democratic Convention speaker. And it speaks volumes of both the growing maturity of Senator Clinton and the undeniable respect in which Senator McCain is held by all patriotic Americans.
 
Her famous 3 am ad, which she avoided bringing up, is still valid though: is Barack Obama the guy we want answering the 3 am call about a world in crisis? Hillary Clinton doesn't think so; John McCain doesn't think so; I don't think so; and deep in your heart, I doubt you think so either.
Tags: HRC II  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Here's to you Mrs. Clinton!

She is unarguably the smartest, cleverest, and most driven woman in politics since the late Eleanor Roosevelt. The sheer grit and chutzpah she brought to national politics when she emerged beside her husband was simply breathtaking.

I say the aforementioned about Hillary Rodham Clinton without an iota of doubt…and I am the guy who spent most of my college years bashing her hard in almost article, essay, and letter I wrote for journals or newspapers. And in the years to come, chances are pretty high that I will continue to harshly criticize the politics and personality of Mrs. Clinton and do my part to help defeat her in general elections.

That said, while this is the week of Barack Obama, let us not for a moment forget the transformational nature of Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy as it enters its official death throes. Never in our history has a woman come this close to breaking the last remaining glass ceiling and, doing so, trail blazed a path for young women for generations to come. I sure hope that the first woman president of the United States will be someone whose philosophy and values will be very different from that of the senior senator from New York, but make no mistake about it that whoever that future female president is will owe a small sliver of gratitude to Hillary Clinton.

It is the irony of ironies that the Democratic Party-the one that spoke loudly of counting every vote equally not too long ago-denied Mrs. Clinton the nomination at the behest of party bosses (superdelegates) who hold veto power in her party. To add insult to injury, she was never even considered for the vice presidency. I guess the snobbish wine-and-cheese crowd of the Obama wing of the party didn’t care much for the no-nonsense working class Democrats that Hillary Clinton represented in the primaries. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that many Hillary supporters, placing country above party and security above appeasement, are choosing to back the only truly bi-partisan candidate for President, John Sidney McCain. Most Democrats are no less patriotic than Republicans and these former Hillary supporters should find a hearty welcome in the country first campaign of former POW John McCain.

She fought a good fight and was gracious in a defeat she didn’t deserve. For the first, and hopefully the last, time in my life here’s a heartfelt cheer to you ‘ole gal!

God Bless America and God Bless Hillary Rodham Clinton

Tags: hrc  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Never a real job

Joe Biden never has had a real job. His entire working life..yes the entire life since he got out of law school...good ole Joe has been on the public dole. And we are supposed to think HE understands what ordinary hard working Americans go through in tough times when jobs are cut suddenly, benefits lost overnight, and performance reviews made a tool of downsizing? A man who has NEVER had to pay health insurance premiums somehow knows the healthcare crisis in America?
 
No wonder he looked like a high fluting ironic fool when he questioned the struggles and well earned accomplishments of that great American success story, Justice Clarence Thomas. No wonder, lacking for words that connect to the ordinary American, that Biden plaigarized an entire speech from former British socialist leader Neil Kinnock in 1988.
 
This is a man who speaks of Bush's 'horrible record' on civil liberties and yet authored the law that eviscerates due process protections for hundreds of thousands of Americans, makes gender bias the law of the land, and helps thousands of predators prey on vulnerable children..all on teh federal dime (the so-called Violence Against Women Act). This is a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic who considers infanticide to be a federally protected right. This is a politician who claims to be a foreign policy guru and yet couldn't bring himself to say a word of condemnation when the Russians brutalized Afghanistan in the 1980s or as they do the same to Georgia today.
 
This is a man who shouldn't be Vice President of the local chamber of commerce..let alone of the United States.
Tags: BIDEN  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saddleback Substance

My apologies to readers about not posting my perspective on the substantive issues raised at the Saddleback forum. The key difference was that of middle of the road, thoughtful judgment born of experience on one hand and ideological idealism buttressed by freshness on the other. In times of war-and we have at least two going on-it is imprudent to trust a man whose sole experience in national policymaking has been 143 days in the Senate where he has been rated the most left wing senator in the 109th Congress.

John McCain's domestic policy approaches are based on thoughtful consideration of the impact of all sorts of taxes on the American family..something of vast importance when the slightest additional tax burden on producers or consumers can launch us straight into recession. His opponent offers a well packaged old product: tax the rich. Senator Barack Obama should remember the famous words of his state's most famous son; "You cannot tax the rich to enrich the poor or tax the employer who creates the employment for the employee."

Those were the words of a small time Springfield lawyer named Abraham Lincoln.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Styles: When Talk is King

Even before I touch on the substantive aspect of the Saddleback Forum tonight, a key difference in style emerged between the candidates. It is a difference that is not surprising but perhaps had not been in the public eye with such glaring spotlight: Barack Obama is very post modern and lawyerly in his long drawn out conversations whereas John McCain reflects the Cliff Notes, to-the-point approach to dialogue, as befits a military man with an English-Scots heritage (remember the dour Scots Calvinists).  In that love of brevity, Senator McCain is a man with whom I can identify. I don’t like long drawn out conversations, emotional greetings and goodbyes, or even endless phone conversations (no wonder my favorite method of communication is the email). Doesn't mean McCain doesn't care or doesn't have feelings..it just means that he perhaps keeps to the Biblical precept that 'too many words are not of the Godly'.

But many Americans in this generation do worship the spoken word (even when they cannot form a proper sentence in English..never mind any other language).

We live in an era where ‘talk’ is king..there are talk shows and talkathaons, and we are told to ‘talk it out’ no matter what the issue is. Every problem, even when there isn’t one, is assumed to be fixed by a visit or two to a counselor/therapist/social worker/shrink etc. I mean we, as a society, distrust silence and solitude. Being succinct and brief is not a virtue in politics in this day and age; hence my concern for Senator McCain. I guess we won’t know the answer till the numbers come in on election night.

Tomorrow’s post, I will focus on the substantive issues raised in the Civil Forum.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah's Law

Six years ago, a 15 year old girl was raped in Southern California, became pregnant as a result, and was taken to a Planned Parenthood clinic to get an abortion by her rapist..a much older man in his thirties. She died during the abortion because the businesses that perform abortion are quick fix places that have no desire to involve family members or others who can help. Loving parents who could have helped with Sarah's medical history and reached out with comfort were never notified until the coroner called them. The rapist was never prosecuted because, thanks to the abortion industry's immense clout in the country, most states actually forbid  abortion businesses from reporting suspected statutory rape ( Yes there are letters of the law but so many loopholes that they don't mean much. Think about it, if all statutory rapes were to be reported by the likes of George Tille and his cohorts, how the heck are these hacks with medical degress going to make money?).
 
Unfortunately, Sarah's is not a unique story. Fortunately, the people of California do have an opportunity to push back against the combined political and financial might of the abortion industry, the child predators, and the lawyers who protect both. Despite continuing to be outspent five to one, pro child welfare advocates were able to qualify Sarah's Law (Proposition 4) for the ballot in the upcoming November general elections. Proposition 4 requires an abortion business to notify the parents of minors prior to conducting an abortion on a minor (with the provision of judicial bypass in special cases of at home abuse), mandates the reporting of suspected sexual abuse, and establishes a 48 hour waiting period unless otherwise warranted medically. Polls suggest that most Californians, including a plurality of Democrats, support the ballot initiative and, like most Americans everywhere, want to bring some sanity back to the outright abortion on demand regime foisted on America's children by the abortion industry and its radical extremist supporters. While it is true that Americans remain as divided as ever over the question of abortion, there is little doubt that an overwhelmingly majorty of Americans, including a plurality of self described 'pr choice' people strongly support common sense middle ground positions like getting rid of taxpayer funding for the likes of George Tiller, full disclosure to patients, and parental consent/information laws with judicial bypass.
 
Sarah's Law is commonsense protection for the children of California and the people of California have a stark choice this November. Either they can show the courage to defy Hollywood and vote for their vulnerable children or they can bend to the money and might of the the abortion industry-predator-lawyer combine. It is not about pro choice versus pro life this time. Rather, this round is between pro child versus pro predator.
Tags: Sarah's Law  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saving Georgia

It is a time honored practice of invaders to bide their moment till the eyes of the world are elsewhere. The wily Russians are no different. As the world turned its attention to Beijing, the Russians struck in Georgia. Now, the tiny but sturdy Republic of Georgia is battling for life and death against a nation whose history has been marked by a rapacious appetite for plunder, conquest, and rapine of its neighbors for a thousand years. Time is of essence for we know not how long the brave but far outgunned and outmanned Georgians can hold out against the might of the resurgent Putinist empire in Russia. We know that old Europe-that is England and France-are no good for anything but appeasement and meaningless communiques; we know that Germany is too mired in its apologia for the Nazi past to want to do anything. It is up to the United States then to banish forever the ghosts of the years past when we were, somewhat rightly, accused of leaving allies to suffer because of old Europe's opinion (the Shah of Iran and South Vietnam come to mind). By diplomatic means and otherwise the Russians need to know that America will not stand by idly while its democratic ally gets pummelled into submission. We will do well to remember that tiny Georgia is one of the few European countries brave enough to be an active part of the Coalition of the Willing in Iraq.
 
The Russians must be stopped cold and the only language they understand is one of purpose backed by power.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A coincidence?

Politicians make the laws (or lack thereof) about the functioning of a civil society like ours. John Edwards, the good 'ole boy Democrat who was just caught cheating on his cancer-stricken wife is one of them. But one thing occured to me as I went through the list of most recent high profile politicians who have been caught cheating on their wives:
 
Bob Packwood (former Republican Senator from Oregon)
Rudy Giuliani
John Edwards
Bill Clinton
Eliot Spitzer
Teddy Kennedy
Dave Patterson (new Democrat Governor of NY succeeding Spitzer)
Marc Dann (disgraced former OH Attorney General)
Paul Morrison (disgraced former KS Attorney General)
Ernie Flecther (disgraced former KY governor)
Guy Newsom (Mayor of San Francisco)
Antonio Villiraigosa (Mayor of Los Angeles)
Jesse Jackson
 
They all have two things in common: they are adulterers and they are loudly 'pro choice'. No wonder their political position is such...I mean if they get their mistresses pregnant, it is much easier to get rid of the 'evidence' and child support payments with abortion on demand (my neighbor Georgie Porgie Tiller does it for 500 bucks a pop, I am told). I guess now I finally understand why these guys feel so passionately about the issue. Hey, it is their self interest on the line, LOL.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Repeal Should Be First Order of Business in 2009

When the very conservative legislature of Montana and the equally liberal legislature of  Rhode Island both overwhelmingly ask Congress to do the same thing, we are on to something. When law and order conservative and former Georgia sheriff Bob Barr and ultra liberal activist Ralph Nader agree on the same issue, we should take notice. For all these institutions and individuals want Congress to repeal the so-called Real ID Act, which has imposed a heavy burden on states, made regular bureaucracies even more cumbersome, and, most important, mandated federal instrusion into the constitutionally protected domain of the states. No matter who becomes president in 2009, the first order of business should be to forever gut the abominable Orwellian-sounding Real ID Act. That law will go down in history as one of the most despicable ones pushed by this President and lapped up by spineless Congress that can only bark when the President's poll ratings are low. And no, it's not the GOP's fault alone; most liberal Democrats who want to repeal it today in Congress, were gladly co-sponsoring that bill when it came up in 2002 (those days when the president was sitting at 70 % ratings).
Tags: REAL ID  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Psychiatrists and Nazis

Memories of passionate outrage came flooding back, along with obvious relief, as KsReaganite heard of the arrest of the psychiatrist described by many as Hitler's mini-me in the second half od the 20th century. Former Bosnian Serb 'president' Dr. Radovan Karadicz, the man who presided over genocide, mass rapes, and medieval torture chambers in the heart of Europe at the dawn of the 21st century had had his luck of 10 years run out when he was picked up by police in Belgrade this morning. This was the man who proved, once and for all that appeasement never paid: aided by the 'neutrality' of the British and the French (who forbid any arms shipments to Karadic's largely unarmed victims) and vicissitude of a Bill Clinton who never tired of trying to impress the European sophisticates with his libertine mannerisms, Karadic's military thugs turned a once peaceful country into killing fields never seen in Europe since the Second World War. History will recall what was perhaps the noblest moment of Senate Minority Leader Bob Dole who risked the ire of his own party, constituents, and national public opinion, when the Kansas Senator stood up and said enough was enough and a sham 'neutrality' that helped slaughter innocents was not the kind of 'neutrality' he was willing to let pass. Thanks to Bob Dole's herculean efforts, Congress forbid the United States armed forces from enforcing the immoral UN arms embargo on the people of Bosnia and their legitimately elected multi-ethnic, multi-religious government. Within months, the Bosnians were able to put up resistance and ultimately salvage what was left of their beautiful country. The rest, as they say, is history.
 
And history teaches us time and again that the French and the British are too traumatized by the Second World War to do anything other than talk, sip wine, and make verbose pronouncements to which no dictator or tyrant pays any attention. The magnificence of Europe's grandeur and the vigor of its soul is now to be found in the Baltics, Ireland, and Poland. Heck, it may not be bad idea to take away the Security Council seats of Britain and France and give them to real powers like India and Brazil...ok just kidding!.
Tags: Karadicz  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ryun for Congress, Kansas Second District

One of the greater tragedies and flukes of the 2006 elections was the surprise defeat of Congressman Jim Ryun of Kansas's Second District to liberal extremist Nancy Boyda. A former Olympian and gold medalist track runner, Ryun is seeking his old seat again in a district that has a slight GOP registration edge but is also home to the city of Lawrence and University of Kansas and the second biggest-per capita-gay community in America. Tomcomplicate matters more, the liberal establishment GOP leadership in the Kansas City area is backing Ryun's primary challenger State Treasurer Lynn Jenkins who is being touted as a 'moderate' and funded as such. I know her and think Mrs. Jenkins is a wonderful state treasurer and has done a good job at that office and should continue doing the great job she is doing managing the money of the Kansas taxpayers.
 
With the possibility of a bigger liberal Democrat majority in Congress and even perhaps a radical liberal president like Barack Hussein Obama, we really don't need amateur country club Republicans in Congress who are often indistinguishable from most liberal Democrats. Jim Ryun, though wrong on No Child Left Behind (he was against it), is a businessman, an athlete, and a family man....in other words the complete person that should serve Kansas in Congress well. His record is there for all to see: lower taxes, strong national security, protection of innocent life, and business friendly policies.
 
KsReaganite has no hesitation in strongly endorsing Jim Ryun, the true Reaganite candidate, in the August 3 primary for Kansas Second Congressional district. I may also add that Mr. Ryun is one of the few male candidates who has received the endorsement of the Susan B. Anthony List PAC, an organization whose major purpose is to elect true feminists to Congress.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Happy 4th and ...

Happy Independence Day my friends, readers, and adversaries! Let us rejoice in the anniversary of the birth of this Republic that is indeed the Last Best Hope for mankind. And let us never, never, never, forget those words captured so well in our collective certificate of birth, words that are written on the hearts of men by the hand of God who assures us that all of us are created with certain inalienable rights and amongst these rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
 
I will be posting only sporadically during July as part of the month will be spent on vacation and part of it as host to some folks very dear to me (KsReaganite's family is going to be visiting him).
 
God Bless You and May He Always Bless America!!
Tags: July 4  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Retort to previous post

I have been asked, and have a received an email or two in pursuance of that query as well, if I find any arguments of the self-declared 'pro-choice' camp intellectually or morally viable. Now, the moral part, I won't address because that is based on deep beliefs anchored in faith. The intellectual part, I shall comment on because it will come as a surprise to many of my readers. There is one line of argument amongst the 'pro choice' advocates that I find very compelling and intellectually rigorous. Unfortunately, perhaps because of the need to keep appearances in a society given to appearances, few make this argument publicly. One person who did make this argument is a woman I met in college (she was in grad school at the time), who was a downright radical feminist and wore black clothes all the time as a mark of that feminism. Perhaps the only thing she and I agreed upon was that the sun comes out in the East. Today she is an administrator in one of those taxpayer funded east coast colleges and still a full fledged feminist, I am sure.
To this woman, until a a baby was actually born and severed physically from the mother, it was not a life or anything like that, but simply a blob of tissue. She did not believe that life began prior to birth. Hence, it became a matter of individual liberty for her..the freedom to do what you want with your own body since nobody's elses' life was involved there. In other words, her beliefs were anchored in an internal integrity that withstood the test of intellectual rigor. It was an argument I found chilling but very well reasoned and steadfast. And I will always respect that argument because it is very impolite, politically incorrect, and yet bold and made with seamless reason. What I find very hard to fathom, is the politically correct stance that 'I personally believe that life begins at conception but....'. But what? If it begins at conception according to you, you should be doing everything possible to extend legal protections to that life; if you don't believe it begins at conception, you should be doing everything possible to protect the personal liberty of the expectant woman.
 
Be like Martin Luther, who some believed was right and others thought was wrong. Few, if any, doubted his intellectual integrity when he calmly told the assembled earthly powers of Europe, to their faces, that 'This is what I believe, here I stand; I can do no other!"
 
Ich nicht kant anders!
Tags: Ich nicht  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another ethical question for liberals

Okay, now I have another tough question for my liberal friends, readers, and adversaries (because I know how conservatives would answer it). Here is the scenario and the question follows.
 
A late term abortion is being carried out in a hospital by a mediocre, but licensed, fellow who has a a MD degree. For whatever reason the abortion is botched and the baby is delivered and is entirely outside the mother's body.
 
At that point, should the hospital staff be required to treat the baby as a human being in dire need of life saving assistance or should they 'correct' the error of the abortion-provider and let the baby die out since that was the original purpose of the procedure anyway?
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive